Other Popular Posts: Five Analytic Tools Twitter Business Teams B2B Twitter Case Study Email The Scoopdog Team
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Read time = 2-3 minutes) So… Twitter is now part of your B2B marketing initiatives. You’ve figured out the basics of measurement and monitoring your competition … made an uneasy peace w/the folx from Legal. The next challenge to having your cake and eating it too, will likely be “multiple account management” as the Twitter passion spreads.
Multiple accounts? You bet. We see easily seven layers and 5+ accounts as practical for even smaller businesses, more possibly – depending on the granularity of sub-brands, geographies and the like. Not all layers need to be used, but all should be thought about. The typical starting point is three not one, yup – three (including two that you may not first think about but that have serious branding consequences). But that gets ahead of the story.
Drivers are the perceived need for audience community segmentation strategies… message volume… and/or native language requirements, among others. What should be balanced is multiple account need v. management complexity, a particularly difficult line to walk given that Twitter tools remain very fluid with functionality still evolving.
“Multiple accounts, or not…” becomes prominent very quickly. More to the point is probably “how many accounts” rather than “multiple or not”. Let’s examine the possibilities:
Layering as a Twitter Account Strategy
- At the Top: Investor Relations. I call this the “corporate” account. Unique content resides here w/r/t financial reports, earnings calls, acquisitions, etc. Tweets will be carefully reviewed and approved. Feds are actively considering regulation that permits social media in satisfying disclosure requirements (blog on the topic). In the beginning, one layer may host the IR/PR/AR and Marketing tweet content.
- Business Division: Marketing Messages. This cut, or the one following (sub-brands/products) are usually the first fragmentation that proactively occurs. Could be a geography cut (US v. Japan), or wanting to distinguish between the investment community (communicated using the top, corporate account) and the business trade community; or, could be separation of several business trade segments (think: automotive v. marine v. energy v. agriculture)
- Sub-brand Segmentation: Product/Technology Messages. It may be that certain product brands or technologies have wide community followings. As such, there is an opportunity to develop vertical Twitter follower channels very narrowly, suggestive of old-media vertical trade publications.
- Branded Individuals: Official: Spokespersons. Trained and trusted. Branded and blessed as an official spokesperson at some level. Naming convention: twitter.com/(company name)(personal name). Clearly a personal account but equally clear that the person is associated w/the company or brand. From this level come the more spontaneous, conversational tweets; from this level, much of the relationship building.
- Branded Individuals: Not Spokespersons. Same Twitter account convention, gives the appearance of official spokesperson, but not blessed. Employees, alums, etc. who elect to have business identity as part of their Twitter account name. Could take the for of: twitter.com/(company name)Bill… or twitter.com/(product brand)/Sara. The risk here is that a personal account by virtue of the naming convention is seen as an official spokesperson when in fact the employee may not be one.
- Accidental Branding: Employees. This, I feel, is the layer of most risk – both for the employee and to the company itself. At this level, employees call out company branding as part of profiles, background graphics, professional resumes, etc. As such, the employee stands a great chance of being found during a brand-driven web search. Unguarded comments, picture tagging, etc. may therefore be associated with the company, inadvertently.
- Unbranded: Employees – Exactly as it says, employees but those who have not, in any way, linked themselves to the company or any of its associated brands. Here, there might actually be opportunity lost, ie w/out a branding link, the company might loose positive halo-effect garnered by a well-known engineer or cutting-edge graphic designer or prominent business marketing manager.
Easily, a single company can quickly emass 5-10 accounts when you consider the corporate top level, let’s say two divisions, three brands and six spokespersons.
It begs the question, what tools exist to better manage multiple Twitter accounts. Would love to hear reader suggestions. Among those gaining ink are: Co-Tweet, Splitweet, Buddymedia, Hootsuite and (but that’s a story for another blog post, down the road).
*****************************************************************************
Welcome! If you like/are interested in B2B Marketing, the Agency-Client Relationship discussion and/or other Marcom mysteries, please subscribe to my RSS feed.
09/03/2009 at 7:15 pm
Hmmmm. While I completely agree that multiple accounts are a great strategy (my organization has 4) I think it is important to be sure that:
a) Each maintains it’s own personality and authenticity.
b) Each provides valuable content to followers BEYOND marketing messages.
c) Followers are carefully amassed using a “tweezers” approach, not “come-one-and-all” approach. It has to be done like segmenting mailing lists.
I fear the day when people run screaming away from social media because the crass marketers have taken over and crowded the space with their narrowly focused marketing messages and forget how important authentic voices and great content are for gaining customer loyalty.
09/04/2009 at 7:17 am
This is a FANTASTIC piece. Thank you so much for thinking it through and bringing form to it.
09/05/2009 at 8:30 am
Great article. Practical in several ways. Good approach and advice. Thank-You
09/06/2009 at 7:49 pm
I agree with @ fssimon – this approach is extreme and to me reeks of “channels” and “marketing” is is not likely to have enduring success.
If I reflect on Zappos or Best Buy I don’t see them fragmenting their brand and customer experience in the way you suggest.
Walter Adamson @g2m
09/07/2009 at 5:18 am
[…] Multiple twitter accounts: A layering strategy for B2B (Jon Carlson, @CarlsonCOS, B2B Marketing Savvy) – useful article for planning your business’ blogging strategy; although it’s twitter-specific, the theory applies to any sort of blogging strategy. …link […]
09/08/2009 at 2:16 pm
My business (and my clients businesses) are small-medium so don’t need this level of sophistication, but your layered approach still applies, thanks!
09/09/2009 at 10:27 am
Thanks for the article. I agree with multiple accounts and the layering concept as useful tools in different vertical markets. For small businesses, I think it can be a management issue, though, and you suggest that. There’s a balance in the time it will take to manage those accounts (even with tools like HootSuite or TweetDeck) and how those accounts will benefit the company/brand.
09/09/2009 at 1:35 pm
Scoop, interesting article. I will definitely consider it for myself and clients.
Just fyi…a couple typos. Let me know if you need a proofreader (I know one, wink, wink).
09/10/2009 at 6:07 am
[…] | Leave a Comment Other Twitter Topics: Tools for Business Teams Multiple Account Layering Strategy More Analytics Email The Scoopdog […]
09/14/2009 at 6:30 am
[…] scoopdog under Marcom for B2B Leave a Comment Other Twitter Topics: Tools for Business Teams Multiple Account Layering Strategy More Analytics Email The Scoopdog […]
09/17/2009 at 11:37 am
[…] network, Twitter | 1 Comment Other Twitter Topics: The Graying of Facebook Multiple Account Layering Strategy More Analytics Email The Scoopdog […]
09/20/2009 at 8:18 am
Good Article. We at Sterizon do something very similar for bringing Social Media Marketing to the restaurant industry. With Email Marketing, we can segment customers based on zipcode or other criteria. But, we quickly realized that with Twitter, we cannot really segment followers for targeted offers. We ended up creating multiple twitter account for a restaurant to put customers in different groups. We treat each twitter account as an email “list”.
09/22/2009 at 6:23 am
[…] for B2B Leave a Comment Other Twitter Topics: The Graying of Facebook Multiple Account Layering Strategy Social Media: Not Just for Kids Email The Scoopdog […]
09/28/2009 at 4:51 pm
[…] a Comment Other Twitter Topics: Marketing at Twitter Speed Multiple Account Layering Strategy Social Media: Not Just for Kids Email The Scoopdog […]
10/01/2009 at 7:07 am
[…] lists, marketing, Twitter | Leave a Comment Other Twitter Topics: Marketing at Twitter Speed Multiple Account Layering Strategy Social Media: Not Just for Kids Email The Scoopdog […]
10/08/2009 at 4:26 am
[…] Wave | Leave a Comment Other Twitter Topics: Marketing at Twitter Speed Multiple Account Layering Strategy Social Media: Not Just for Kids Email The Scoopdog […]
10/21/2009 at 7:34 am
Cool post as for me. I’d like to read a bit more concerning this matter.